LinkedIn

View Rajesh Mohandas's profile on LinkedIn

Monday, February 3, 2014

EBITDA and SG&A Improvement… the cash flow story (Part 1)


26th June 2013, the day two giant IT Companies merged officially and the market stopped tracking Mahindra Satyam and the only entity continued to exist is TechMahindra.

This was the day I took over a role as a Sr. Consultant in the business and process space to contribute towards driving continuous improvement projects to enable free cash flow thus improve the EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) … one of the most critical measure of the company's valuation tracked in the capital markets by the financial experts.
As a first step we spent time with the business leaders who looked to maximize the return on investments evaluate impact of operating the business on free cash flow. In an environment of maximizing value, it was important to review all business expenses and conduct a profitability analysis across all the projects. In so doing we discovered at the project level the contributors who impact EBITDA, which increases the value of your business and the ones who are pulling it down. As a next step I and my team lead by the best of the leadership worked hard to help understand sales, general, and administrative (SG&A) and look to maximize those costs as a percentage of revenue.

 It’s a known fact that High operating costs lower your EBITDA… one of the things that I have done in the past is to quickly identify all value enabling activities and digitize them those that will need people involvement outsource them to low cost channels. I carry a very strong philosophy from my past experience that my people will work only on the value added tasks and process rest all value enabling tasks be outsourced and kill the non-value add. The first few suggestion made people hesitant to entertain the idea of lowering operating costs because they immediately equate it with lying off employees. It took quite some time to educate the crowd that there are a lot of other ways to lower your operating costs without reducing staff. Could be as simple as turning off your machines and lights to save energy, wastage of food and the network usage to start with the journey of Lean following the principles of HoShin KanRi and go with the policy implementation.
Ideas and best practices picked up from the experience of the past helped spin a quick fix just do it kind of projects around Cycle time improvement that directly impacts billability. Two teams were given tasks to build the six sigma culture as a DNA in the organization.  8 – 10 leaders in a consulting role attached themselves with each business group.

I owned the entire set of support functions and kicked off the improvement path by checking for areas of inefficiency that can be corrected with new policies and procedures … focus was to be lean and quick on the solution front without spending a lot of time on data collection and data analysis, because it’s a known issues to all just an as is process / value stream map is good enough to identify waste and eliminate it strengthening policies and procedures.
Wing to Wing financial analysis of each support function opened a wide set of opportunities to focus up on… Cab usage, arrival pattern and employee commutation costs were identified to fix asap and then engaged a team from facilities to pull down the power tariff and work towards improving efficiency on energy usage. Companies like GE and Philips were consulted and engaged in the solutioning and implementation of ideas.

Visa Cycle time and Air Travel was another big ticket item that was looked at. No doubt that a growing company will have a growing spend on the travel and the ticket prices are equally volaitile, but there were a lot of opportunities like blocking the ticket 6 hours in advance, reducing approval cycle time w.r.t. travel request, choice of travel class (Economy / Business), Travel mode like Air, Road or Train, effective use of technology like telepresence and video conferencing, strengthened planning to reduce the last minute cancellations, overcome date changes in travel. Policies governing around international travel and the per diems associated etc… accounted a good round of savings.
Infrastructure spend was another big-ticket item on the list which owned a lion’s share of the budget, with growth comes the overheads related to network and datacentres, storage and spend on TSP. Reducing the call volume and number of service requests was another area that improved productivity, reducing the approval cycle time and simplifying the approval matrix made the operations lean.

Projects were spinned around DSO… days out standing … the accounts payable and receivable cycle time, employee reimbursements, finance ERPs, invoicing defects and delays and wing to wing cycle time at the collections front added more savings and directly impacted the bottom-line which was an icing on the cake resolving quite a good amount of issues related to the cash flow.
Optimizing the wing to wing resource supply chain and hiring cycle time, enabling ease w.r.t. joining formalities made life more comfortable adding at least 35 days of additional billability and improving the revenue stream added a new flavour all together to the program.

While you have read the positives and the things done we encountered a situation where like any other company the execution looked bleak, as long as there was focus things were moving and as the focus shifted there variation crept in. IT Systems and structures did not help much. Performance targets were poorly defined we lacked insights into the long term levers, while the near term picture looked great there were concerns around the sustainability and long term results were questionable.
This is a time when we looked like being exhausted with the ideas and best practice picked up from the market and most of the things already implemented, there was nothing new to identify from a cost optimization whereas there were a lot of opportunities around cycle time improvement that will lead only to notional cost compared to hard savings that could impact the bottom line.

It was a time to rethink on what I was actually doing, initial enthusiasm and quick fix projects from the past experience will not help in the long term and I need to now strike the right balance between targeted reductions, re-allocation and re-investment in areas that can driver higher overall expense productivity over time. It was very important to establish benchmarks that are truly “apples-to-apples” and start looking at highly-granular spending breakdowns; more importantly clear understanding of the strategic, tactical and organizational “drivers” of world-class cost structure performance is something I started to focus up on.

Days passed by and a series of brainstorming session threw light on prioritizing the strategic goals, relooking at the degree of centralization and empowerment to local teams, funding mechanisms, vendor rationalization, realigning roles and responsibilities, hierarchy … head to tail ratios, opportunities of outsourcing as a new set of projects to focus up on in the coming year….

While the first year was a cake walk with quite a good amount of savings making the bottom-line healthier and reaching the set goal, it’s in this coming fiscal that a lot of people in raising eyebrows to ideas being brainstormed and extending surface level … people involved at middle and lower management feeling insecure as soon as talks w.r.t. outsourcing and role rationalization were being discussed … nonetheless a lot of support from the Sr. Management is adding a lot of confidence to the program and the determined will and focus is helping me overcome all hurdles and moving forward to accomplish the goal…  truely a great expriance and awesome company to work with :-)

No comments:

Post a Comment